execstack bit for lisp compilers ecl, gcl and sbcl

[Rex Dieter]

Gérard Milmeister wrote:
> I noticed that that sbcl binary was installed with the execstack
> bit on, while ecl and gcl had execstack off. Sbcl worked with
> both selinux enabled and disabled, gcl and ecl only with selinux
> disabled. If I switch the execstack bit on, both work as expected.
> This seems to be an extension of selinux compared to FC4...
> But how does it happen that sbcl has the execstack bit on? Rex?

Dunno, nothing special packaging-wise that I'm aware of... guess I'll
have to take a closer look at the source code (but nothing jumps out at
me after a quick once-over).

-- Rex