[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: initng


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459


daner964 at student.liu.se changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|http://initng.thinktux.net/d|http://download.initng.think
                   |ownload/v0.4/               |tux.net/v0.6/




------- Additional Comments From daner964 at student.liu.se  2006-03-24 02:23 EST -------
Initng 0.6.0RC1 has just been released. The big difference from earlier versions
is that the scripts are released in a separate tarball. Question is what we want
to do about this. It seems quite clear to me that it would be nice with separate
rpm's, but does that mean having separate spec and srpm files as well or do we
just add a Source1 and another %package section to the existing spec file?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.