What's worse: unowned directories or multiple owners?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le mardi 28 mars 2006 à 11:43 -0600, Rex Dieter a écrit :
> Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > Maybe the third time is the charm:
> > 
> > I want to install a file into /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/ but I don't 
> > want to Requires: /usr/share/emacs/site-list/.  Do I own 
> > /usr/share/emacs... in my package or do I leave open the possibility 
> > that the dir is unowned if emacs in not installed?
> 
> IMO, they're equally minor esthetic evils that can be lived with either way.

There's one I hate more (unowned directories) but in the end do as your
package reviewer asks you to and you'll be fine

The reviewer is always right. You can tweak you package once it's in the
repo if it eats at you too much.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 199 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060328/1face314/attachment.sig>