Re: Carrying alternate kernel builds in Extras

[Dave Jones <davej redhat com>]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 08:29:51AM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
 > >>>>> "HdG" == Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> writes:
 > 
 > HdG> Maybe just file a bug about this, because its clearly not a
 > HdG> feature and Dave figure out how he is going to handle the bug,
 > HdG> and only after he decides to close it as won'tfix then do the
 > HdG> additional kernel in extras limbo?
 > 
 > The bug for the underlying kernel issue is
 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187127

For FC5, the safest way forward is to introduce a new kernel
rather than changing any of the existing ones.
I'll re-add the old 586-smp kernel in the next update.

For FC6, I'll look into doing something more creative.

		Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk