Re: Packaging guidelines: buildroot

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

Axel Thimm (Axel Thimm ATrpms net) said: 
> Makes sense, it will make an end to the fantasy of BuildRoot name
> inventes (like adding the uid ...).
> 
> But what happens when a package has no BuildRoot and neither does a
> macro for it exist? Would it potentially eat the user's home?

rpmbuild: Fatal, no build root defined

(I doubt it does this now...)

Bill