[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-24
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-11-24
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:54:31 -0500
Christopher Stone (chris stone gmail com) said:
> IIRC, tibbs did this a few months ago on a package that was in the
> report for months and after he launched a rebuild the maintainer came
> on this message list and lambasted tibbs for launching a rebuild.
> tibbs then got upset and said he would never attempt to help out in
> this regard again.
>
> I think there was some technical reason why the rebuild should not
> have been done, so there needs to be a way for a developer to say, I
> cannot fix this dependency problem because of some other issue, and
> request QA SIGs to not push rebuilds.
Sure, but without such a thing, just fix the damn problem.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]