[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: New Comps Groups



Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 à 15:57 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas mailhot laposte net) said: 
> > > I'm in agreement with Bill on this.  Pretty much all the python-*
> > > packages should be pulled in as dependencies.  Am I missing something
> > > here?
> > 
> > It's pretty much impossible to autodetect missing comps entries unless
> > every package is systematically put in comps. No autochecking means low
> > QA.
> 
> What constitutes 'missing'? Just something that should be selectable but
> isn't there? I would hope that those sorts of things would become apparent.

A new package which has not been classified at all (ie the contributor
"forgot" to think about comps at all)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]