2006-October Archive by Date

• Messages sorted by: [ Thread ] [ Date ] [ Author ]
• Other months

01 October 2006

• When does FE-6 / devel branch happen?  Hans de Goede
• Re: When does FE-6 / devel branch happen?  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: list of not rebuild arch packages where needs.rebuild was removed  Paul Howarth
• Re: list of not rebuild arch packages where needs.rebuild was removed  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: list of not rebuild arch packages where needs.rebuild was removed  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-01  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-01  buildsys
• Remaining FE6 cleanups  Ville Skyttä
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-01  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Remaining FE6 cleanups  Hans de Goede
• Re: Remaining FE6 cleanups  Michael J. Knox
• Re: Pulse audio?  Pierre Ossman
• Re: list of not rebuild arch packages where needs.rebuild was removed  Paul Howarth
• Re: Remaining FE6 cleanups  Rob Andrews
• File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development  Michael Schwendt
• Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development  Michael Schwendt

02 October 2006

• Re: Remaining FE6 cleanups  José Matos
• Re: File conflicts in Fedora Extras Development  Ralf Ertzinger
• rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Xfce 4.4rc1 call for testing  Kevin Fenzi
• Re: compiz manager  Jarod Wilson
• Re: compiz manager  Rahul Sundaram
• another semi-mass-rebuild (Was: Re: rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-02  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-02  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-02  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: compiz manager  Jarod Wilson
• Yet another license question  Orion Poplawski
• Re: another semi-mass-rebuild (Was: Re: rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21)  Robert Scheck
• Re: Yet another license question  Patrice Dumas
• Re: another semi-mass-rebuild  Jason L Tibbitts III

03 October 2006

• Re: another semi-mass-rebuild (Was: Re: rebuilt for unwind info generation, broken in gcc-4.1.1-21)  Jose Pedro Oliveira
• Re: Yet another license question  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Yet another license question  Kevin Kofler
• Re: Yet another license question  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Yet another license question  Kevin Kofler
• Re: Yet another license question  Hans de Goede
• Re: Remaining FE6 cleanups  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Yet another license question  José Matos
• awol package submitter (alsa-oss)  Denis Leroy
• Re: awol package submitter (alsa-oss)  Paul Howarth
• Re: compiz manager  Jarod Wilson
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Dag Wieers
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Rex Dieter
• Re: Yet another license question  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-03  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-03  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-03  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Yet another license question  Paul Wouters
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Paul Wouters
• Re: Yet another license question  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Yet another license question  Paul Wouters
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Denis Leroy
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Enrico Scholz
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Yet another license question  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: compiz manager  Jarod Wilson
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Enrico Scholz

04 October 2006

• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Callum Lerwick
• Re: New comps group proposal: audio-production  Callum Lerwick
• Re: New comps group proposal: audio-production  Bill Nottingham
• Re: New comps group proposal: audio-production  Dave Jones
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Warren Togami
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Peter Gordon
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Enrico Scholz
• Re: compiz manager  Jarod Wilson
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Enrico Scholz
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Siddharth Upmanyu
• Re: New comps group proposal: audio-production  Callum Lerwick
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Callum Lerwick
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Enrico Scholz
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Hans de Goede
• Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Christopher Aillon
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Josh Boyer
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Rex Dieter
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Thorsten Leemhuis
• orphaning xffm  Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-04  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-04  buildsys
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Jarod Wilson
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-04  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Christopher Aillon
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Rex Dieter
• Essential difference between CentOS and Fedora (Was: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras)  Dag Wieers
• Re: rpmforge and {enterprise, } Extras (Was Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras=  Dag Wieers
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  José Matos
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Ville Skyttä

05 October 2006

• Re: rpms/git/devel .cvsignore, 1.32, 1.33 git.spec, 1.21, 1.22 sources, 1.32, 1.33  Peter Gordon
• Re: rpms/perl-Readonly/devel perl-Readonly.spec,1.2,1.3  Ville Skyttä
• Re: New comps group proposal: audio-production  Florin Andrei
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Paul Howarth
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Jonathan Underwood
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• semi-mass rebuild completed  Christian Iseli
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Glade 3 is not in Core  Tarjei Knapstad
• Re: Glade 3 is not in Core  Denis Leroy
• Re: Glade 3 is not in Core  Ralf Ertzinger
• Need help for my talk proposal at FOSS.IN  Kushal Das
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Need help for my talk proposal at FOSS.IN  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Need help for my talk proposal at FOSS.IN  Kushal Das
• Re: semi-mass rebuild completed  Christian Iseli
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Jesse Keating
• Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: semi-mass rebuild completed  Anthony Green
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Christopher Aillon
• Re: rpms/perl-Readonly/devel perl-Readonly.spec,1.2,1.3  Chris Weyl

06 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-05  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-05  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-05  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: rpms/perl-Readonly/devel perl-Readonly.spec,1.2,1.3  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  David Woodhouse
• Team Effort (was: Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Kushal Das
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Paul Howarth
• Want to claim ownership of the orphaned package straw  Kushal Das
• Re: Want to claim ownership of the orphaned package straw  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Want to claim ownership of the orphaned package straw  Kushal Das
• What about prozilla (Re: Want to claim ownership of the orphaned package straw)  Kushal Das
• Re: rpms/perl-Readonly/devel perl-Readonly.spec,1.2,1.3  Chris Weyl
• Re: semi-mass rebuild completed  Andrew Overholt
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Want to claim ownership of the orphaned package straw  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: owners.list to PackageDB translation status and opinions  Michael Schwendt
• Re: owners.list to PackageDB translation status and opinions  Christian Iseli
• paraview dependency problem  Christian Iseli
• Soon to be marked dead packages  Christian Iseli
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Dave Jones
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Jesse Keating

07 October 2006

• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Jason L Tibbitts III
• taking over gnome-applet-netmon (Re: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Christoph Wickert
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-06  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-06  buildsys
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Michael Schwendt
• Re: taking over gnome-applet-netmon (Re: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Christoph Wickert
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Jesse Keating
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Michel Salim
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Brandon Holbrook
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Warren Togami
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Axel Thimm
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Paul
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Warren Togami
• Re: paraview dependency problem  Patrice Dumas
• Claiming ownership of mediawiki (was: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Axel Thimm
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christoph Wickert
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Christoph Wickert
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Michael Schwendt
• CVS Maintenance  Mike McGrath
• Multiple entries in comps-fe6.xml.in  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-06  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Claiming ownership of mediawiki  Brandon Holbrook
• Claiming ownership of mantis (was: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Claiming ownership of mantis  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Multiple entries in comps-fe6.xml.in  Christian Iseli
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christian Iseli
• Re: taking over gnome-applet-netmon (Re: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Christian Iseli
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christian Iseli
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christian Iseli
• Re: paraview dependency problem  Christian Iseli
• Re: CVS Maintenance  Christian Iseli
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christian Iseli
• offline/vacations  Christian Iseli
• help needed on the gwyddion review  Patrice Dumas
• Re: help needed on the gwyddion review  Michel Salim
• Re: help needed on the gwyddion review  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Claiming ownership of mantis  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Claiming ownership of mantis  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Multiple entries in comps-fe6.xml.in  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Claiming ownership of mantis  Gianluca Sforna

08 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-07  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-07  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-07  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Extras x86_64 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-10-07  Matt Domsch
• Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-10-07  Matt Domsch
• MaintainerResponsibilityPolicy (was Re: Claiming ownership of mantis)  Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Dear Fesco: Orphan package process needs work  Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Hans de Goede
• Re: Claiming ownership of mediawiki  Axel Thimm
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-10-07  Christoph Wickert
• packaging of gui app: should it require X + wm ?  David Timms
• Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: taking over gnome-applet-netmon (Re: Soon to be marked dead packages)  Christoph Wickert
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Multiple entries in comps-fe6.xml.in  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Thorsten Leemhuis
• FE-Legal bugzilla tickets  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: packaging of gui app: should it require X + wm ?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: packaging of gui app: should it require X + wm ?  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Michael Schwendt
• I am a newbie. Can i get some ideas  Amit Dey
• Re: I am a newbie. Can i get some ideas  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: FE-Legal bugzilla tickets  Rex Dieter
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: I am a newbie. Can i get some ideas  Arthur Pemberton
• Re: I am a newbie. Can i get some ideas  Christopher Stone
• Re: I am a newbie. Can i get some ideas  Christopher Stone
• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-08  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-08  buildsys
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Ville Skyttä
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-08  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Paul
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Ville Skyttä
• Re: packaging of gui app: should it require X + wm ?  David Timms
• Re: CVS Maintenance  Mike McGrath

09 October 2006

• Re: Need your help: Docs in the wiki  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2006-10-07  Alain PORTAL
• Re: packaging of gui app: should it require X + wm ?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/listen/devel listen.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2  Michael Schwendt
• [All Rebuilt] Re: Final reminder, Fedora Extras rebuild for FC6  Gavin Henry
• Unorphaning putty  Jima
• Charge of Prozilla  Kushal Das
• Re: Charge of Prozilla  Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Charge of Prozilla  Chitlesh GOORAH
• Re: Charge of Prozilla  Kushal Das
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Jima
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Bill Nottingham
• How to reply to the mail in the mailing list  Amit Dey
• Important - unorphaning packages properly  Ville Skyttä
• Re: How to reply to the mail in the mailing list  Dawid Gajownik
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages - updated list  Ville Skyttä
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-09  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-09  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-09  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages - updated list  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages - updated list  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages - updated list  Gianluca Sforna

10 October 2006

• Re: Soon to be marked dead packages  Toshio Kuratomi
• Ownership of Fyre  Brian Pepple
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-10  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-10  buildsys
• Drop Packages  Walter Cervini <[volp]>
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-10  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Michael Schwendt

11 October 2006

• Re: rpms/gnupg2/devel .cvsignore, 1.12, 1.13 gnupg2.spec, 1.50, 1.51 sources, 1.14, 1.15  Mamoru Tasaka
• Advice on rpath  Neal Becker
• Re: reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Jima
• Re: Advice on rpath  Kevin Kofler
• Re: rpms/gnupg2/devel .cvsignore, 1.12, 1.13 gnupg2.spec, 1.50, 1.51 sources, 1.14, 1.15  Rex Dieter
• Re: Advice on rpath  Rex Dieter
• rng-tools / rng-utils / core functionality vs extras ?  Paul Wouters
• Re: rpms/galago-filesystem/devel galago-filesystem.spec,NONE,1.1  Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/gnupg2/devel .cvsignore, 1.12, 1.13 gnupg2.spec, 1.50, 1.51 sources, 1.14, 1.15  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: rpms/galago-filesystem/devel galago-filesystem.spec,NONE,1.1  Brian Pepple
• Re: reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Ville Skyttä
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-11  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-11  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-11  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Advice on rpath  Linus Walleij
• Re: Advice on rpath  Patrice Dumas
• Packages marked as dead  Ville Skyttä

12 October 2006

• Re: rng-tools / rng-utils / core functionality vs extras ?  Dave Jones
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Roland McGrath
• Re: Yet another license question  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Roland McGrath
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Paul Howarth
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Roland McGrath
• Re: reassigning multiple bugs in bugzilla  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Packages marked as dead  Paul Howarth
• Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Denis Leroy
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Denis Leroy
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Alain PORTAL
• Re: Advice on rpath  Linus Walleij
• Re: Advice on rpath  Hans de Goede
• Re: rng-tools / rng-utils / core functionality vs extras ?  Paul Wouters
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Rex Dieter
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Denis Leroy
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  David Nielsen
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-12  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-12  buildsys
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Mamoru Tasaka
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-12  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Peter Gordon
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Frank Büttner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Jima
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Josh Boyer
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Toshio Kuratomi
• Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Frank Büttner
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Josh Boyer
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  seth vidal
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Garrick Staples
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Jima
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Daniel P. Berrange
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Jima
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Frank Büttner
• desktop files for dockapp apps?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: rpms/qt4-qsa/FC-5 qsa-1.2.1-Qt4.2-preview.patch, NONE, 1.1 qt4-qsa.spec, 1.3, 1.4  Rex Dieter
• Re: Advice on rpath  Linus Walleij
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-12  Nils Philippsen
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  seth vidal

13 October 2006

• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  Bill Nottingham
• Re: Global list of used TCP/UDP ports  seth vidal
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Warren Togami
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Christopher Stone
• Desktop drapes: GNOME wallpaper manager  Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Linus Walleij
• Re: Desktop drapes: GNOME wallpaper manager  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Desktop drapes: GNOME wallpaper manager  Denis Leroy
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Brandon Holbrook
• Re: FC5 tripwire RPM & possible maintainer available.  Keith G. Robertson-Turner
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Kevin Fenzi

14 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-14  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-14  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-14  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Advice on rpath  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: FE-Legal bugzilla tickets  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: help needed on the gwyddion review  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: Important - unorphaning packages properly  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-14  Kevin Kofler
• Re: FE-Legal bugzilla tickets  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-14  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Re: rpms/lua/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 lua.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.6, 1.7  Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/lua/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 lua.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.6, 1.7  Hans de Goede
• Re: FE-Legal bugzilla tickets  Tom 'spot' Callaway

15 October 2006

• help with comps.xml and lineak-related packages  Chris Petersen
• Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: rpms/lua/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 lua.spec, 1.18, 1.19 sources, 1.6, 1.7  Hans de Goede
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: extras-buildsys/utils/pushscript/yum Errors.py, NONE, 1.1 __init__.py, NONE, 1.1 comps.py, NONE, 1.1 config.py, NONE, 1.1 constants.py, NONE, 1.1 depsolve.py, NONE, 1.1 failover.py, NONE, 1.1 logger.py, NONE, 1.1 mdcache.py, NONE, 1.1 mdparser.py, NONE, 1.1 misc.py, NONE, 1.1 packages.py, NONE, 1.1 parser.py, NONE, 1.1 pgpmsg.py, NONE, 1.1 plugins.py, NONE, 1.1 repos.py, NONE, 1.1 sqlitecache.py, NONE, 1.1 sqlitesack.py, NONE, 1.1 transactioninfo.py, NONE, 1.1 update_md.py, NONE, 1.1  seth vidal
• Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Hans de Goede
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-15  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-15  buildsys
• Re: extras-buildsys/utils/pushscript/yum Errors.py, NONE, 1.1 __init__.py, NONE, 1.1 comps.py, NONE, 1.1 config.py, NONE, 1.1 constants.py, NONE, 1.1 depsolve.py, NONE, 1.1 failover.py, NONE, 1.1 logger.py, NONE, 1.1 mdcache.py, NONE, 1.1 mdparser.py, NONE, 1.1 misc.py, NONE, 1.1 packages.py, NONE, 1.1 parser.py, NONE, 1.1 pgpmsg.py, NONE, 1.1 plugins.py, NONE, 1.1 repos.py, NONE, 1.1 sqlitecache.py, NONE, 1.1 sqlitesack.py, NONE, 1.1 transactioninfo.py, NONE, 1.1 update_md.py, NONE, 1.1  Michael Schwendt
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-15  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III
• new repo  Ian Chapman
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Axel Thimm
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III
• libtorrent/rtorrent last update bad  Lars Gullik Bjønnes
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Axel Thimm
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Linus Walleij

16 October 2006

• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Rick L Vinyard Jr
• Re: libtorrent/rtorrent last update bad  Chris Chabot
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Hans de Goede
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Hans de Goede
• Re: devel/common Makefile.common,1.36,1.37  Adrian Reber
• Re: CVS Maintenance  Christian Iseli
• Re: devel/common Makefile.common,1.36,1.37  Andy Shevchenko
• Re: devel/common Makefile.common,1.36,1.37  Mike McGrath
• Re: devel/common Makefile.common,1.36,1.37  Mike McGrath
• Re: devel/common Makefile.common,1.36,1.37  Jeremy Katz
• Review for Horde  Brandon Holbrook
• Re: rpms/scanbuttond/devel buttonpressed.sh, NONE, 1.1 initscanner.sh, NONE, 1.1 scanbuttond-0.2.3.diff, NONE, 1.1 scanbuttond.init, NONE, 1.1 scanbuttond.spec, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1  Ralf Corsepius
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-16  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-16  buildsys
• Re: rpms/gnubiff/devel gnubiff.spec,1.4,1.5  Peter Gordon
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-16  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-16  Peter Gordon
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Advice on rpath  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Is there any reason amarok is no longer in the fc5 yum listing  Jay Thorne

17 October 2006

• not in fedorabugs group, so i can't assign FE-REVIEW's to me  Paul Wouters
• Re: not in fedorabugs group, so i can't assign FE-REVIEW's to me  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: not in fedorabugs group, so i can't assign FE-REVIEW's to me  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Last warning don't modify my packages!!!  Warren Togami
• Re: Desktop drapes: GNOME wallpaper manager  Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Meeting Summary 10-12-2006  Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-17  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-17  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-17  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• claim for orphan packages  Walter Cervini
• Plague documentation?  John Villalovos

18 October 2006

• Re: claim for orphan packages  Steven Pritchard
• Re: Plague documentation?  Dan Williams
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Rick L Vinyard Jr
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Announcing Dribble a new addon repo for Fedora Extras users  Hans de Goede
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Gianluca Sforna
• [Bug 166481] Review Request: ngrep - network grep  bugzilla
• [Bug 167253] Review Request: cernlib - CERN library and associated binaries  bugzilla
• [Bug 166481] Review Request: ngrep - network grep  bugzilla
• [Bug 167253] Review Request: cernlib - CERN library and associated binaries  bugzilla
• [Bug 168032] Review Request: gnome-applet-timer - Gnome Timer Applet  bugzilla
• [Bug 168032] Review Request: gnome-applet-timer - Gnome Timer Applet  bugzilla
• Re: Plague documentation?  Linus Walleij
• Re: Plague documentation?  Dan Williams
• [Bug 169973] Review Request: python-clientform - ClientForm  bugzilla
• [Bug 169973] Review Request: python-clientform - ClientForm  bugzilla
• [Bug 170995] Review Request: system-config-control - System Control Center  bugzilla
• [Bug 172428] Review Request: acpitool - A command line ACPI client for Linux  bugzilla
• [Bug 172521] Review Request: tetex-tex4ht - Translates TeX and LaTeX into HTML or XML+MathML  bugzilla
• [Bug 173368] Review Request: planet  bugzilla
• [Bug 174240] Review Request: artwiz-aleczapka-fonts  bugzilla
• [Bug 174266] Review Request: libgsf113 - GNOME Structured File library 1.13  bugzilla
• [Bug 178142] Review Request: jakarta-commons-cli - Jakarta Commons CLI  bugzilla
• [Bug 179708] Review Request: dap-freeform_handler - FreeForm data handler for the OPeNDAP Data server  bugzilla
• [Bug 179709] Review Request: dap-hdf4_handler - HDF4 data handler for the OPeNDAP Data server  bugzilla
• [Bug 179710] Review Request: dap-netcdf_handler - NetCDF 3 data handler for the OPeNDAP Data server  bugzilla
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jima
• Noisy Bugzilla  Christian Iseli
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Plague documentation?  Axel Thimm
• FE Package Status of Oct 18, 2006  Christian Iseli
• Tracking gnome.org projects  Denis Leroy
• Re: Tracking gnome.org projects  David Nielsen
• Re: Tracking gnome.org projects  David Nielsen
• Re: Plague documentation?  Dan Williams
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-18  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-18  buildsys
• Re: Plague documentation?  John Villalovos
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-18  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Plague documentation?  John Villalovos
• Re: Co-maintainers to assist upstreams with their packages in Extras  Jason L Tibbitts III

19 October 2006

• recipes for bugzilla activity  Patrice Dumas
• Re: recipes for bugzilla activity  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: recipes for bugzilla activity  Bill Nottingham
• State of multilib development  Hans de Goede
• Re: State of multilib development  Linus Walleij
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-19  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-19  buildsys
• Buildroots for RHEL  David Lutterkort
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  seth vidal
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-19  Garrick Staples
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  David Lutterkort
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  David Lutterkort
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-19  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  seth vidal
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-19  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Buildroots for RHEL  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-19  Jeffrey C. Ollie

20 October 2006

• Buildsys Downtime  Dennis Gilmore
• Package naming query  Michel Salim

21 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-20  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-20  buildsys
• Re: Package naming query  Christopher Stone
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-20  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• How to do Graphics Programming  Amit Dey
• Re: Package naming query  Michel Salim
• Re: How to do Graphics Programming  Callum Lerwick
• exclude arch for PPC64  Paul
• Clamav packages and compatibility problems  Alberto Chiodi
• devel package for only two symlinks?  Christoph Wickert
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Christoph Wickert
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Clamav packages and compatibility problems  lonely wolf
• Re: Clamav packages and compatibility problems  Alberto Chiodi
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Michael Schwendt
• Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Owen Taylor
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Christoph Wickert
• Re: devel package for only two symlinks?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Christopher Stone
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Paul
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Ian Chapman
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Paul
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Josh Boyer
• Re: rpms/libburn/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 libburn.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4  Peter Gordon
• RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Owen Taylor
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  John Ellson
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Tom 'spot' Callaway

22 October 2006

• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Josh Boyer
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Owen Taylor
• Re: rpms/libburn/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 libburn.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.3, 1.4  Jesse Keating
• Something wrong with ppc builder?  Garrick Staples
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Hans de Goede
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  José Matos
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Paul
• hammer3 build server causes trouble  Michael Schwendt
• Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?  Michał Bentkowski
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Owen Taylor
• Re: exclude arch for PPC64  Josh Boyer
• build kmods for ppc64 (was: Re: exclude arch for PPC64)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Something wrong with ppc builder?  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: hammer3 build server causes trouble  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: hammer3 build server causes trouble  Mamoru Tasaka
• RPM  Roland Wolters
• Failed Builds Last 24 hours  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Failed Builds Last 24 hours  Peter Gordon

23 October 2006

• Re: RPM  Norman Gaywood
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• Webspace for a package review  Gawain Lynch
• Re: Webspace for a package review  Peter Gordon
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Re: RPM  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Webspace for a package review  Oliver Falk
• Re: Webspace for a package review  Gawain Lynch
• Where should go Perl libraries files?  Christian Jodar
• Re: Webspace for a package review  Oliver Falk
• Re: Webspace for a package review  Oliver Falk
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Matthias Saou
• Re: RPM  Roland Wolters
• Re: RPM  Roland Wolters
• Re: RPM  Roland Wolters
• Fwd: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Fwd: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Fwd: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Re: Fwd: RPM  Tom 'spot' Callaway
• How to rename a cvs module  Jochen Schmitt
• Re: How to rename a cvs module  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: How to rename a cvs module  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Where should go Perl libraries files?  Garrick Staples
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Fwd: RPM  Matthew Miller
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Matthew Miller
• Re: Where should go Perl libraries files?  Patrice Dumas
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-23  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-23  buildsys
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Rex Dieter
• Re: Putting the mugshot client in fedora-extras  Bill Nottingham
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Bill Nottingham
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Patrice Dumas
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-23  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Mike McGrath
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Is there any Python interface to Red Hat's bugzilla?  Michał Bentkowski
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Matthew Miller
• Re: How to rename a cvs module  Jochen Schmitt
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Rex Dieter
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Rex Dieter
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 3 - 2006-10-23  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk  Hans de Goede
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk  Hans de Goede
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk  Paul Howarth
• Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras _3_ due to missing wkgtk  Matthew Miller
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: RPM  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Alexander Boström
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM  Rex Dieter
• Re: RPM  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: RPM  Josh Boyer
• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  Ralph Angenendt
• Re: RPM  Paul Howarth
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Patrice Dumas
• Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.  Peter Lemenkov
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Ville Skyttä
• Re: RPM  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.  Rex Dieter
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: RPM  Roland Wolters
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Michael Schwendt
• Reminder about CVS SYNC  Mike McGrath
• Re: RFC: Junk in Fedora Extras  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.  Tim Jackson
• Re: RPM  Christopher Aillon

24 October 2006

• Fwd: RPM  Jeff Johnson
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Chris Weyl
• Re: RPM  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Paul Howarth
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Paul Howarth
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Renaming of fuse-encfs and fuse-sshfs to encfs and sshfs respectively.  Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Dan Williams
• Re: Buildsys Downtime  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Nils Philippsen
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Patrice Dumas
• Buildsys Outage  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Patrice Dumas
• Splitting an existing package  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Splitting an existing package  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Splitting an existing package  Rex Dieter
• Warning possible incompatible imlib2 update! (devel branch only)  Hans de Goede
• Re: Buildsys Outage  Dennis Gilmore
• xview anyone ?  Christian Iseli

25 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24  buildsys
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24  Kevin Kofler
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Chris Weyl
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-24  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• New Project: pungi - A Fedora release composing tool  Jesse Keating
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Ralf Corsepius
• Re: RPM  Jeff Spaleta
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-24  Ville Skyttä
• Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: xview anyone ?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: xview anyone ?  Christian Iseli
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Matthias Saou
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Matthias Saou
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Matthias Saou
• Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Rex Dieter
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Build-sys weirdness  Mamoru Tasaka
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-25  buildsys
• testing repo (was: Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: testing repo (was: Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?)  Rex Dieter
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Build-sys weirdness (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-24)  Jima
• Attention, all FE packagers!  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jesse Keating
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: How to rename a cvs module  Jochen Schmitt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jesse Keating
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!  Andy Shevchenko
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Thorsten Leemhuis
• jd (was: Re: Build-sys weirdness)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Attention, all FE packagers!  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: jd  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Policy RFC: When to touch other peoples packages (or: Fix stuff that needs fixing)  Jeff Spaleta
• Re: jd  Rex Dieter
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Christian Iseli
• Re: RPM  Jonathan Underwood
• Re: jd  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: New Project: pungi - A Fedora release composing tool  Nikolai
• FE Package Status of Oct 25, 2006  Christian Iseli
• FESCo Meeting 2006-10-19  Toshio Kuratomi

26 October 2006

• Re: Initial Proposal for doing Enterprise Extras  David Lutterkort
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25  buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25  Anthony Green
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25  Anthony Green
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-25  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-25  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: jd  Ville Skyttä
• Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change (was: Re: jd)  Mamoru Tasaka
• I would like to take ownership of gnome-themes-extras  Chris Ausbrooks
• Re: I would like to take ownership of gnome-themes-extras  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change (was: Re: jd)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Jesse Keating
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Matthias Saou
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Jesse Keating
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Rex Dieter
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extras build system back up  Dan Williams
• Re: Extras build system back up  Dan Williams
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25  Orion Poplawski
• Re: Desktop-file-utils 0.11 change  Axel Thimm
• Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-25  Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/geomview/devel geomview.spec,1.28,1.29  Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/geomview/devel geomview.spec,1.28,1.29  Rex Dieter
• FCXStatus wiki pages  Michael Schwendt
• Build machine failures  Mike McGrath

27 October 2006

• Re: Extras build system back up  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Extras build system back up  Ralf Ertzinger
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  buildsys
• State of multilib development update  Hans de Goede
• Howto build i386 packages on x86_64 FC-6  Hans de Goede
• Re: State of multilib development update  Ralf Corsepius
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-27  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Extras build system back up  Jesse Keating
• Headsup: significant libcddb update for devel repo  Hans de Goede
• Re: Howto build i386 packages on x86_64 FC-6  Nicolas Mailhot
• Enhanced AWOL policy  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Headsup: ogre soname change in next push  Hans de Goede
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy  Paul Wouters
• 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Gérard Milmeister
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Matt Domsch
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Gérard Milmeister
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Matt Domsch
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Gérard Milmeister
• Thanks everyone for your great work in Extras  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Michael Schwendt
• gcstar module disappeared from CVS  Christian Jodar
• Re: gcstar module disappeared from CVS  Michael Schwendt
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

28 October 2006

• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27  buildsys
• Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  buildsys
• repoview for debuginfo packages?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?  Jesse Keating
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-27  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  Matt Domsch
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  Tim Jackson
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  Rahul Sundaram
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: 32-bit glibc required in mock for building oorexx on x86_64. How?  David Woodhouse
• Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Thanks everyone for your great work in Extras  Josh Boyer
• comps.xml in Extras (was: Re: repoview for debuginfo packages?)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: comps.xml in Extras  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Josh Boyer
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Re: Package EVR problems in FC+FE 2006-10-27  Thorsten Leemhuis
• Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/FC-6 wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Michael Schwendt
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)  Mike McGrath
• Re: Invalid rebuilds (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-27)  Michael Schwendt
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-28  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-28  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• wvs-data (was: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-28)  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Tim Jackson
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Tim Jackson
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Gianluca Sforna
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Callum Lerwick
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Josh Boyer
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Christopher Stone

29 October 2006

• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Re: comps.xml in Extras  Dennis Gilmore
• Re: wvs-data  Mamoru Tasaka
• Heads-up: mono-basic  Kevin Kofler
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic  Kevin Kofler
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• Re: wvs-data  Ville Skyttä
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic  Paul
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• SH fingerprints for FE machines  Ralf Ertzinger
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic  Paul
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Matthias Saou
• Re: Heads-up: mono-basic  Kevin Kofler
• Re: rpms/wvs-data/devel wvs-data.spec,1.1,1.2  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: wvs-data  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: comps.xml in Extras  Michael Schwendt
• Re: wvs-data  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• Re: wvs-data  Mamoru Tasaka
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?  Michel Salim
• Duplicity is orphaned  Robert Scheck
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• Re: redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?  Matt Domsch
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jeffrey C. Ollie
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-29  buildsys
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-29  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: redhat-lsb not in ExceptionList?  Michel Salim

30 October 2006

• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Axel Thimm
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Denis Leroy
• Re: xview anyone ?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Horst H. von Brand
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Denis Leroy
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Denis Leroy
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Jason L Tibbitts III
• find-lang.sh syntax  Tanguy Eric
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Ville Skyttä
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Tanguy Eric
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Michael Schwendt
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Tanguy Eric
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Michael Schwendt
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Tanguy Eric
• Re: find-lang.sh syntax  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy  Brian Pepple
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy  Brian Pepple
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Christopher Aillon
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Tom 'spot' Callaway

31 October 2006

• Re: Enhanced AWOL policy  Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• New libgda and libgnomedb packages available for testing  Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31  buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31  Matthias Saou
• Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-10-31  Fedora Extras repoclosure
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Christopher Aillon
• Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31  buildsys
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Michael Schwendt
• gkrellm update, please check your plugins  Hans de Goede
• Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-10-31  Matthias Saou
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Peter Gordon
• gemi yum repository rebuilt for FC6  Gérard Milmeister
• is fc5 building closed?  Jean-Luc Fontaine
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Piotr \"Raven\" Drąg
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Ville Skyttä
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Piotr \"Raven\" Drąg
• Re: is fc5 building closed?  Rex Dieter
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Ville Skyttä
• Re: is fc5 building closed?  Dan Williams
• Re: is fc5 building closed?  Jean-Luc Fontaine
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Peter Gordon
• Re: Fedora Extras packaging beta software into production repos, why?  Christopher Aillon
• Re: desktop files for dockapp apps?  Patrice Dumas
• Re: rpms/gaim-gadugadu/devel dead.package,NONE,1.1  Michel Salim