Re: list of not rebuild arch packages where needs.rebuild was removed

[Paul Howarth <paul city-fan org>]

On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 14:04 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb:
> > 
> > Paul Howarth schrieb:
> >> On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 11:28 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>> I just ran my scripts again. It seems there are sill some arch specific
> >>> packages that were not rebuild, but needs.rebuild was removed. See this
> >>> list:
> >> ...
> >>>> paul_AT_city-fan.org               libpng10                        1.0.20-3.fc6
> >> ...
> >>> Is there any good reason why these packages were not rebuild?
> >> The stated goals of the rebuild are:
> > [...]
> >> Now I *could* bump the EVR and rebuild this package, but it seems rather
> >> pointless to me.
> > 
> > Please rebuild it. tia.
> > 
> BTW, I could give reasons for it. But most can be found in the
> list-archives around the date when we did the the mass-rebuild for FC5.
> 
> The biggest one that now: We waited for a "go" from Core and started
> when binutils and other changes were considers stable. That was not the
> case in early August iirc.

OK, bumped and rebuilt.

Paul.