Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Enrico Scholz <enrico scholz informatik tu-chemnitz de>]

paul xelerance com (Paul Wouters) writes:

>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582
> ...
> But I don't think we should start using different c libraries for
> random binaries.

Tickets above are not for "random binaries" but for projects which are
designed for dietlibc. Using glibc for them would make binaries larger,
slower and increases memory usage without providing a single gain.



Enrico