Re: linking statically against dietlibc: a blocker?

[Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>]

> rather than to the packager. Also I don't buy the efficiency argument: 
> glibc is used by every single executable in a Fedora environment, and 
> therefore is constantly in memory and hot in the cache. There should be 
> a powerful argument to link against something other than glibc, and a 
> faster startup time seems unconvincing.

Enrico tested the running executables and found those statically linked
against dietlibc to be faster.

--
Pat