[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: python noarch vs arch
- From: Sander Hoentjen <sander hoentjen eu>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: python noarch vs arch
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:40:47 +0200
On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 16:34 +0200, Sander Hoentjen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on packaging cohoba, this is a python gui client/mission
> control for telepathy. It has one small .c file, so I have a few
> questions:
> - because of the .c file the package has to by arch-specific i guess. Is
> there a strong preference to package as noarch? (the c part is used for
> changing the name for killall, so to put it as noarch i can just leave
> that part out (not being able to killall cohoba), or add a dependency on
> python-ctypes and add a small patch to cohoba to use ctypes to do it
> instead)
>
i didn't want to send yet, so i'll continue:
- should i just not care about arch vs noarch and package as arch
specific, then where must i place the modules, all in python_sitelib and
only osutils (the c one) in python_sitearch?
thanks for any pointers
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]