python: mixing sitearch and sitelib (was: python noarch vs arch)

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sat Sep 2 16:52:00 UTC 2006


On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:40:07PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:38 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 12:27:54PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 18:23 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > > OK, so in your POV a user asked whether it is OK to place foo.py
> > and
> > > > bar.so in sitelib and sitearch respectively and you answer that
> > baz.py
> > > > can't be installed under both sitearch and sitelib.
> > > > 
> > > > I think it's better to admit the original error instead. :) 
> > > 
> > > I think its better if you stop being a prick.  You're making
> > assumptions
> > > based on things not even in my text, misconstruing the words that I
> > > wrote, and thus stating I'm "confused and gove wrong advice".  This
> > is
> > > horseshit and you know it.  Now stop being a prick.
> > 
> > Wow, looks like you can't really deal with admitting an error. And
> > violating netiquette isn't nice, too. 
> 
> When you actually show me an error I've made, I'll admit to it.  So far
> all I've seen is you making wrong assumptions about my text and using
> those assumptions to try and point out some flaw in me as a person and a
> packaging committee member.  Maybe it's because I voted down your last
> (few) proposal(s).  Holding a grudge are we?

I've already explained it in several posts now. If you can't
understand/admit/whatever, trying again won't change that - according
to the tone your replies reached at it looks more like it will trigger
Godwin's law.

I'm not trying to point out a flaw in you as a person, if you're
looking for something putting you under a bad light it's yourself, and
the choice of language you assume appropriate for this communication.

Anyway, as soon as someone starts using personal adjectives like you
do, I rapidly lose interest in continuing discussion.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060902/1fe799e4/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list