Normalizing the Fedora Extras 6 comps.in file

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le dimanche 03 septembre 2006 à 02:14 -0700, Peter Gordon a écrit :
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Thanks. If anything is lost please ping me so I can fix the stylesheet,
> > but so far it has passed all my sanity checks :
> > [..]
> > Should I save the stylesheet somewhere ?
> 
> What I would do is diff against and update it from the CVS comps module, then if
> your changes make sense (i.e. no wrongly moved or deleted packages in the list),
> go ahead and commit that back to Extras CVS.

Ghaaa, Christian already told me to go ahead so I commited the sorted
file.

Attached is the diff (I normalised the old comps with xmllint --format
to avoid tracing indenting changes)

I've checked it manually without finding any mistake. The only
"dangerous" change is the :

! Ignoring duplicate reference to default package xfwm4-themes in group
XFCE (xfce-desktop).
  Only its first reference (optional package) will be kept.

But when a package is referenced twice in the same group with different
types, it's difficult to decide which one to keep.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: comps.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 44986 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060903/b5d1db55/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20060903/b5d1db55/attachment.sig>