[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- To: "Discussion related to Fedora Extras" <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Cc: "Discussion related to Fedora Extras" <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: We are evaluating building packages from Fedora Extras for RHEL
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 10:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
> On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 13:17 +0100, Paul wrote:
>> Problem with having Fedora in any of the proposals is that despite
>> Fedora being a recognised "brand", the Extras is known to be a community
>> contributed area with none of the QC that goes into the paid for product
Actually, if we want to kill the Fedora Core = alpha product myth,
dissociating FE for EE from the Fedora project would be about the most
stupid thing we could do PR-wise now.
The more I think about it the less I like the hiding under the carpet
Fedora thing. If Extras is good enough the Centos people want some sharing
they'll have to accept to carry the Fedora brand. Despite what their PHBs
think.
Now you can theme the entreprise section so it's visually different (other
base colours), but it shouldn't be separate (other names and logos).
Fedora Extras for the Entreprise has my vote
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]