txukart -> supertuxkart, new package?
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Wed Sep 20 13:51:24 UTC 2006
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> Matthias Saou schrieb:
>> Hans de Goede wrote :
>>> The alternative is to submit a new supertuxkart package which obsoletes
>>> tuxkart, question will this cause automatic upgrades of tuxkart to
>>> supertuxkart?
>> This would definitely be best.
>
> +1
>
>> [...]
>> Now the real question is : Do you need to go through the new package
>> submission process?
>
> I think this once again needs to be handled on a case-by-case basis:
>
> If upstream changed a lot of stuff or if the spec file was heavily
> reworked -> new review.
>
> If it's more like a regular update with a name-change -> announce it on
> fedora-extras list and attach a spec-file diff so interested people can
> quickly skim over it and veto if they see blockers. If everything is
> quiet for 48 hours -> just import it,request branches, ...
>
> CU
> thl
>
Its more like a regular update, I'll put it through the review requests
anyways to make Chris' scripts happy. I assume someone will do a quick
review for me then. I'll send a mail asking for such a "quick" review
when I'm ready.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list