buildsys fedoraproject org wrote :
UNKNOWN OWNER (possibly Core package):
Since all of these aren't directly relevant to Extras, I'm assuming
they aren't reaching their maintainers like they should, so...
audit
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.2.7-4.fc5 > 0:1.2.7-2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208532
device-mapper
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.02-3.2)
FC4-updates > FC6 (0:1.02.07-2.0 > 0:1.02.07-1.1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208533
eclipse-changelog
FC4 > FC6 (1:2.0.1_fc-21 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)
FC5-updates > FC6 (1:2.1.0_fc-2 > 0:2.3.1-1.fc6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208534
lvm2
FC4-updates > FC5 (0:2.02.06-1.0.fc4 > 0:2.02.01-1.2.1)
FC6 not affected.
mozilla
FL3-updates > FC4-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc4)
FL3-updates > FC5-updates (37:1.7.13-1.3.1.legacy > 37:1.7.13-1.1.fc5)
FC6 not affected (now that firefox from Core obsoletes mozilla).
perl-Net-DNS
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
quagga
FC4-updates > FC5-updates (0:0.98.6-1.fc4 > 0:0.98.6-1.FC5)
FC6 not affected.
tar
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:1.15.91-1.FC5 > 0:1.15.91-1)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208536
I hope these minor (but important) rebuilds will make it into the final
FC6 tree so that we have the cleanest possible upgrade path.