[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RFC: FAS E-mail == Bugzilla E-mail?
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RFC: FAS E-mail == Bugzilla E-mail?
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:02:33 -0500
Warren Togami (wtogami redhat com) said:
> Implementation
> ==============
> 1) Most users are already fine.
> 2) Those users who do not yet match, they have the option of either:
> a) Change their FAS e-mail address.
> b) Change their Bugzilla address. (this requires a one-time change
> by dkl in the Bugzilla database)
>
> Benefits
> ========
> - owners.list contains FAS account names instead of arbitrary e-mail
> addresses.
> - Those account names can be directly used by the VCS ACL
> - Simplified view in Package Database
>
> Key question
> ============
> Is this an unreasonable requirement? Please comment.
The public availability of bugzilla e-mails has caused people to
use specific e-mail addresses for that (presumably for spamtrapping);
they may not want to use this for general Fedora mail.
FWIW, the account<->bugzilla discrepancy applies to all of 8 users,
at the moment. So I'm not sure how critical it is.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]