[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Tracking down broken dependencies in devel
- From: Michael Schwendt <bugs michael gmx net>
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Tracking down broken dependencies in devel
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:13:04 +0100
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:29:43 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
> On 12/31/06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > I understand that devel is often in a state of flux as dependencies get
> > upgraded and packages need to be rebuilt and tweaked, but I don't think
> > it's very good to have things that are broken for many months.
> > If you run into problems rebuilding your package, you should ask for
> > help on the list or upstream, IMHO.
>
> My broken deps in -devel can be fixed by removing the offending packages:
> kmod-sysprof-kdump - 1.0.7-1.2.6.18_1.2849.fc6.1.i686 (25 days)
> kmod-sysprof-xen - 1.0.7-1.2.6.18_1.2849.fc6.1.i686 (25 days)
> kmod-sysprof-xen - 1.0.7-1.2.6.18_1.2849.fc6.1.x86_64 (25 days)
>
> BTW, I am not even sure why they are still there...
Because kmod- packages are excluded from automated pruning.
This is correct for final releases of the distribution, but apparently not
for Rawhide.
Does Rawhide contain only a single kernel package release at a time? It
seems so. If that is true, we can simply drop "kmod-" from the whitelist,
and let repoprune kill the old package releases.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]