[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: FE Package Status of Jan 11, 2007
- From: Christian Iseli <Christian Iseli licr org>
- To: fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: FE Package Status of Jan 11, 2007
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:14:58 +0100
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:25:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Can you give examples?
Huh, sure here is one example (but I get the impression we are not
talking about the same thing for some reason...)
In http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/i386/
you will find:
alsa-tools-1.0.12-4.fc7.i386.rpm
while in http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/ppc/
you will not find an alsa-tools binary package
So the count of binary packages in i386 is bound to be different than
the count of binary packages in ppc.
> It sounds a bit like ExcludeArch/ExclusiveArch abuse.
Why ?
C
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]