[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Extras License Audit
- From: Till Maas <opensource till name>
- To: Patrice Dumas <pertusus free fr>, fedora-maintainers redhat com, fedora-extras-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Fedora Extras License Audit
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:47:07 +0100
On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:57, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 03:16:24PM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > just requires knowledgable people looking at the package source code and
> That's supposed to be done during review, isn't it? How could an audit
When I asked what needs to be done to check the license of a package in review
it was said that it is enough to check the upstream documentation, e.g. the
COPYING file. So looking into every source file for license information was
probably not done for every package. And sometimes even included binary files
slip through review e.g. in XaraLX.
Regards,
Till
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]