[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora Extras License Audit
- From: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh farsiweb info>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Fedora Extras License Audit
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 18:03:24 +0330
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Fundamental counter-question: Do the GPL infected parts of pango impose
> the GPL on non-GPL'ed applications being linked against it?
Not really. The code is copied from FreeType. FreeType is already
GPL/FTL, and any application that uses FreeType (almost every modern
desktop application) is bound to follow that license, which means that
it should either be GPL-ed, or respect the FTL license also.
But don't ask me about a good description of FTL. I still need to read
it thoroughly.
Roozbeh
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]