[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Data Packages Guideline



On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "AT" == Axel Thimm <Axel Thimm ATrpms net> writes:
> 
> AT> If the existing guidelines cover this (which they do), then why
> AT> add it?
> 
> Because it needs to be written down somewhere.
> 
> AT> Anything for the packaging guidelines needs to be voted upon.
> 
> No disagreement, but this isn't a modification to the packaging
> guidelines.

It was suggested as one.

> Are you sure you understand what's being discussed here?  How would
> anyone know about the procedure for doing this if it weren't in the
> wiki somewhere?

I understand, I'm not that dense. ;)

Did you read the following parts in my mail?

> the addition is perhaps better made in the review guidelines.
> [...] But, as said, this probably just needs to be a clarification
> elsewhere.

I suggested twice to put it in the wiki, just not in the packaging
guidelines.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpDf3yIu9SNn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]