[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
python-basemap packaging
- From: Orion Poplawski <orion cora nwra com>
- To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list redhat com>
- Subject: python-basemap packaging
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:55:23 -0600
I'd like some advice on how to handle a change to the way python-basemap
upstream has changed its packaging.
Currently we have two SRPMS:
python-basemap
python-basemap-data
The later is a big noarch package containing the data files for
python-basemap (low, medium, and high resolution maps). Since
python-basemap does not work without it, it is a requirement.
Now, upstream has bundled the low and medium resolution maps with the
main package, and ships basemap-data-hires with just the high resolution
maps.
Also, there is a very large (14MB) examples directory that is currently
shipped with the main package, which I'm going to make into a subpackage.
So:
1) I could put it all under python-basemap, with examples and data-hires
subpackages and drop python-basemap-data. But then we loose the noarch
for the data.
2) I could rename python-basemap-data python-basemap-data-hires and no
longer have it a requirement. Not sure about upgrade paths though.
Should it Obsoletes python-basemap-data so that it gets installed by
default so people who have been using the high res maps don't have to
all of a sudden install a new package?
3) Strip the data (and possibly the examples) out of the tar ball and
keep the same packaging (though possibly adding a new noarch examples
package). Don't really like this.
Thoughts?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion cora nwra com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]