[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-fonts-bugs-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 433584] [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:22:44 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: [ml_IN] Traditional scripts (smc-fonts) to be included in fonts-indic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433584
------- Additional Comments From pravi a ippimail com 2008-04-14 02:22 EST -------
* We don't want to have version embedded with font names - we used to have
Rachana_w01, Rachana_g01 inside the fonts and we decided best way is not to have
the versions as a newer version font cannot show the documents which use older
version of fonts. We needed the version difference to be visible to the users,
so we are keeping the version in filename.
* It is not necessary that everyone use the entire tarball but individual fonts
and so we are keeping version for each font.
* you can change the rpm package name to anything you wish.
* All fonts are developed by different authors and we can't decide on a common
license. I don't see it as a problem because the package is an aggregation and
not a derivative work.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]