[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-fonts-bugs-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 04:30:49 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017
------- Additional Comments From nicolas mailhot laposte net 2008-07-07 04:30 EST -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> I am not sure it is a good idea to rename the package from the upstream name.
We have the case here of an upstream naming that's very close to our own
conventions, so it's not so clear cut. But in other cases we don't hesitate to
rename, so I don't see why not there.
IMHO (and Debian has gone this way too lately) we'll need someday to review all
our font package names to be more strict and consistent. Consistency pays big
time with users and upstream namings are sadly not consistent at all.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]