[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-fonts-bugs-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 468580] License: export control restrictions violates GNU/FSF recommendation
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:13:25 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468580
Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa redhat com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa redhat com> 2008-10-26 23:13:24 EDT ---
The version you pulled out of bugzilla is a much older revision. The text
you're worried about isn't in the latest version of the Liberation Font
license:
https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/browser/trunk/License.txt
Paragraph 5 says (in its entirety):
5. General. If any provision of this agreement is held to be unenforceable,
that shall not affect the enforceability of the remaining provisions. This
agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of North Carolina and of
the United States, without regard to any conflict of laws provisions, except
that the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods shall not
apply.
In fact, the wording "destination country" that you quote, never appears in the
current license.
The only font package that still is under the old license terms seems to be the
Fedora 8 package, definitely not rawhide as you've claimed.
Closing as NOTABUG.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]