[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-fonts-bugs-list redhat com
- Subject: [Bug 480482] [terminus] update to new font package naming guidelines
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:27:48 -0500
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480482
Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs n-dimensional de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas mailhot l
| |aposte.net)
--- Comment #1 from Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs n-dimensional de> 2009-02-04 10:27:47 EDT ---
So far, the package names were as follows:
SRPM: terminus-font
RPM: terminus-font-x11
(X11 bitmap font set in normal/bold and several sizes)
RPM: terminus-font-console
(console bitmap font set in normal/bold and several character sets)
The new rules say "Fedora font packages are named
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts, in lowercase".
I can't see any foundry, upstream[1]'s project name is "Terminus Font - a clean
fixed width font", I don't see a special "fontfamilyname", so my package would
need to be called "terminus-font-fonts"?
Changing from old "terminus-font" to "terminus-fonts" with a trailing s could
sound better and be less redundant and confusing.
Presuming I have eventually worked out the proper name to call the SRPM, I will
call the package containing the X11 font files the same, after the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme.
But what happens with the console fonts? %{name}-console would violate the
[foundryname-]projectname[-fontfamilyname]-fonts naming scheme. Or are all the
"fonts" rules only applying to X11 fonts anyway and there are no rules for
console fonts? I could do a "-n terminus-font-console" to keep the old package
name in the latter case.
Anyway, I'd really like to build the package with the console fonts in the same
source package if possible.
[1] http://www.is-vn.bg/hamster/
(Partly) related bugs:
bug 477433: nted's "convert to new font pkg guidelines" bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433#c7
bug 483589: current terminus-font-x11's registering of the X11 fonts broken
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483589#c0
If any part of this is better discussed on fedora-fonts-list, feel free to do
so. I am subscribed there.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]