[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 354991] why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy
- From: bugzilla redhat com
- To: fedora-fonts-list redhat com
- Subject: [Fedora-fonts-list] [Bug 354991] why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:25:54 -0400
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354991
------- Additional Comments From nicolas mailhot laposte net 2007-10-27 04:25 EST -------
dejavu and dejavu-lgc have historically been two different packages built two
different ways and maintained by two different persons. So they've not always
been in sync.
Since both are used as default fonts by a lot of people we've avoided pushing
updates after the last test releases, as people complain in a big way if their
default font was broken. dejavu and dejavu-lgc entered F8T3 with different
levels and therefore will hit F8 with different levels (also most of the fixes
in 2.20 where out of the lgc range)
For F9 dejavu and dejavu-lgc will be built from the same source package so
they'll always be in sync in the future
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22419) I'm not sure if we
want to take the risk of offering 2.21 as a F8 update when it's released.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]