[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Mukti fontset license
- From: Michal Nowak <mnowak redhat com>
- To: b ghose gnu org
- Cc: fedora-fonts-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Mukti fontset license
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:19:46 +0200
ping?
On 10:11 Wed 16 Jul , Michal Nowak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora Linux distribution considered packaging Your Mukti fontset,
> but we found out that the license is GPLv2+, which we consider as
> excellent for software but not for fonts.
>
> The problem we see is that when you embed the font inside PDF file
> then the whole document has to be licensed as a GPLv2+ too. This is
> thought to be controversial.
>
> Do you think it can be possible to change the license to e.g. 'GPLv2+
> + Font Exception'? The Exception would be this one:
>
> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#FontException
>
> Which just says that just embedding the font does not mean that you
> have to license your file (e.g. book) as GPLv2+ too.
>
> Let me know whay you think.
>
> Looking forward to your reply.
>
> Regards,
> Michal
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]