[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Had a look at Charis SIL
- From: "Vasile Gaburici" <vgaburici gmail com>
- To: "Ben Laenen" <benlaenen gmail com>, fedora-fonts-list redhat com
- Cc:
- Subject: Had a look at Charis SIL
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:52:21 +0300
It uses *lots* of multiple (ligature-type) substitutions, sprinkled
with some context-based substitutions, and some single substitutions
in multiple ccmp tables (some tables are class-based, some glyph
based). It's unlike any of the simple stuff that Adobe or other fonts
do. I wonder how they maintain all that... Does anyone know if they
have their own production tools?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]