[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: TeX fonts, part one [Was: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposed amendment to general packaging guidelines: no bundling of fonts in other packages]
- From: "Dave Crossland" <dave lab6 com>
- To: gaburici cs umd edu
- Cc: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>, Fedora Font SIG <fedora-fonts-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: TeX fonts, part one [Was: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Proposed amendment to general packaging guidelines: no bundling of fonts in other packages]
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:50:51 +0100
2008/7/25 Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici gmail com>:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Nicolas Mailhot
> <nicolas mailhot laposte net> wrote:
>> — We should not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories.
>> TEX should use system fonts directly.
>
> XeTeX can do that. TeX probably NEVER will because that violates TDS.
> If you don't what that means, then don't take on the subject of TeX
> fonts.
I second the idea that TeX ought to be an exception to the guideline
"not hide general-purpose fonts in app-specific directories"; TeX
predates all other programs in a GNU/Linux system, and TeX users have
hardended expectations about how it works; if Fedora's TeX package
fiddles with things, that will be a loss for users.
(I'm still not getting Nicolas' emails :-(
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]