[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: TeXGyre fonts licensing concern
- From: "Dave Crossland" <dave lab6 com>
- To: gaburici cs umd edu
- Cc: "Jerzy B. Ludwichowski" <Jerzy Ludwichowski uni torun pl>, Hans Hagen <pragma wxs nl>, Volker RW Schaa <v r w schaa gsi de>, fedora-fonts-list <fedora-fonts-list redhat com>, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa redhat com>
- Subject: Re: TeXGyre fonts licensing concern
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:22:43 +0100
2008/7/30 Vasile Gaburici <vgaburici gmail com>:
> My lack of legal brain is confused on this. If URW doesn't change the
> license and it remains purely GPL, but the other contributors agree to
> re-license their parts as GLP+FontException, then what is there to be
> gained by this? Isn't the user bound by most restrictive license in
> the package, that is pure GPL?
That is my understanding, and my point :-)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]