[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fontconfig rules installation guidelines change proposal
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- To: fedora-fonts-list redhat com, Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad redhat com>, fedora-packaging <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Fontconfig rules installation guidelines change proposal
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:10:23 -0400
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've queued the following small guideline change proposal for FPC
> consideration:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig)
>
> Please add comments, reactions and corrections in the wiki.
Hi Nicolas,
I like the direction of it.
The idea of having separate conf.avail and conf.d is that sysadmins can
symlink/unlink entries into conf.d to enable/disable configuration for their
system. This would only work if upgrading fontconfig/fonts rpms does not
reinstate the unlinked symlink. However, last time I checked this was not
working correctly. Can you check this first?
Thanks,
behdad
> Regards,
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]