[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa redhat com>
- To: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- Cc: Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh gmail com>, fedora-fonts-list redhat com, fedora-legal-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Legal issues with new font guidelines
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:54:29 -0500
On 2009-01-28 at 8:41:39 -0500, "Nicolas Mailhot"
<nicolas mailhot laposte net> wrote:
> However if you don't you'll have to deal with the directory ownership
> of the common font directory (I purposefully didn't want to open this
> particular can of worm) and other common files.
>
> Also documentation can be bulky, especially when upstream provides in
> in pdf or .doc form with embedded bitmaps of what the font looks like.
Well, it seems like there wouldn't be much of a case to obsolete -common
in that scenario, just move the license into each subpackage.
~spo
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]