[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13
- From: Rajesh Krishnan <fedora krishnan cc>
- To: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos serpentine com>
- Cc: Yaakov Nemoy <loup hexago nl>, Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs math uh edu>, fedora-haskell-list redhat com, Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora <fedora-packaging redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] Revised Haskell Guidelines 2008.08.13
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:24:48 -0700
Bryan,
I have forked cabal-rpm (with due credits to you, and the code is still GPL)
that does generation of the Fedora specific SPEC file only, with the new
macros. I chose to do that because there were too many changes I needed to
get some things right, and get rid of other stuff (like executing rpmbuild)
that were irrelevant for my purposes.
I would publish the code once it becomes half stable and somewhat working.
Please don't take this otherwise, as your code is absolutely great Haskell
work and I learned some finer Haskell coding styles while studying your code.
-Rajesh
On 2008-08-28-Thu 06:44:05 am Bryan O'Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Rajesh Krishnan <fedora krishnan cc> wrote:
> >> If we're using cabal-rpm for packaging
> >> then we really don't need to add rpm macros IMHO.
> >
> > I am very much in favor of having good set of base macros (under
> > /etc/rpm/).
>
> I like to have both the macros and cabal-rpm, where the latter assumes
> the presence of the former.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]