Infrastructure SCM

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 09:19 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 9:13:10 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> > starting this up again.  Since we want it to be distributed we're left
> > with either git or mercurial.  Can I take a non-binding vote from the
> > people on this list as to a preference on each?  Remember, our needs in
> > Infrastructure are really pretty simple, so at a glance.  What do you
> > guys think?
> >
> >
> > git:
> >
> > mercurial:
> +1 i find it a little easier  though its really a coin toss

bzr: +1 :-)  Easier than git or mercurial from a former svn user's
perspective.

With either git or mercurial, I'll spend some time learning it and then
just use whichever is implemented.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070702/c9d16213/attachment.sig>