Backups
Nils Breunese
nils at breun.nl
Tue Jun 5 21:26:40 UTC 2007
Mike McGrath wrote:
> We're starting to get into backup needs that will include a lot of data
> thats not redundant so backuppc's pooling won't really benefit us that
> much.
Ok, fair enough. I thought there was talk of having static content on
multiple servers, that's where BackupPC's pooling feature could come in
pretty handy, but I have no idea about what amounts of data we're talking.
> Hopefully we'll be using both tape and disk backups. Once our new disk
> tray gets in we'll have to prepare to backup a couple TB of Binary
> RPMs. Some of our backups will be going to disk, some will be going to
> tape. Additionally it seems that bacula is more efficient at backing
> things up.
Efficient in term of what precisely? And what backend are we using with
BackupPC right now?
Nils Breunese.
More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list
mailing list