Fedora 7 Upgrade

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Jun 7 15:53:59 UTC 2007


On Thursday 07 June 2007 11:49:57 Mike McGrath wrote:
> I agree, I had no plans on upgrading any of our RHEL boxes (except for
> cvs and db1 but will stay in the RHEL upgrade path).  For those of you
> that are new on the list we've had a lot of discussions about this in
> the past.  Our team, for the most part, agrees that its about picking
> the right tool for the job.  For boxes that don't need brand new
> technologies (like cvs) its nice to be able to set them up and forget
> about them.  But for some boxes that do need the latest and greatest
> (like our builders) we've always had and kept them on Fedora.

With RHEL5 out, I question the need for Fedora on the builders.  In fact, 
before the merge, all the internal Core builders were running RHEL4.  Can we 
not use RHEL5 on the builders now?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/attachments/20070607/fd11407b/attachment.sig>


More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list