Fedora 7 Upgrade

Luke Macken lmacken at redhat.com
Fri Jun 8 00:52:29 UTC 2007


On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 12:19:01PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>  Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Depends...
> >
> > What is the reason for those boxes to be on Fedora instead of RHEL?  If
> > it's because FC6 had things not in RHEL4 maybe we can make a switch to
> > RHEL5 at some point.  If the reason is we want the flexibility of moving
> > to the latest code along with Fedora instead of waiting for RHEL to
> > upgrade/backport then perhaps they should be on the latest Fedora where
> > the latest code is more likely to land sooner.
> >
> > In the case of the app servers running TurboGears, I think that it was a
> > lack of TG requirements on RHEL4 that held us back.  I also think we're
> > close to having TG for RHEL5 so we might want to move test servers to
> > RHEL5, check that the applications run there, and then move the app
> > servers handling those to RHEL.
> >   
> 
>  This is very true as well, I've not tested the TG status in RHEL5.  Has 
>  anyone else?  Luke?

Looks like we're just waiting on python-kid[0].

luke

[0]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239134




More information about the Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list