[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] System
- From: Carlos Villegas <villegas math gatech edu>
- To: tanner real-time com, Supporting EOLd RHL and Fedora releases<fedora-legacy-list lists dulug duke edu>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] System
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 10:03:41 -0500
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:54:19PM -0600, Bob Tanner wrote:
> How about a cvs tree to start putting stuff?
>
> How about a policy on how the cvs tree will be maintained, ie rh73 branch,
> rh80 branch, rh9 branch or 1 .spec with %ifdef's to build them all?
>
> Taking a queue from the debian people, what's are social contract?
I've actually been wondering how are we going to handle the digital
signatures, or better said, how are we going to establish the trust
since probably most of the "erratas" will be security ones. I think
that has has to be the first step (or among the first).
I also wonder what will be the "end of life" policy. This might have
been discussed before, I think I read somewhere 1 year after Fedora,
but I'm not sure (I think that is reasonable).
I'm new to the list and discussion, but I'm ready to help. Bring it on.
Carlos
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]