[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: System




> My idea is that once things are handed over to the Legacy Project, they
> should be considered more or less "frozen".  It's not that I want to
> lock out Legacy users from newer features, it's just that I believe
> these releases should be looked upon as "stable" and not mucked with
> unnecessarily. I doubt the Project will have a lot of extra QA
> resources, so we'd need to concentrate them where they can do the most
> good for the least effort.

I would echo that sentiment, both from a resources and stability point of 
view. I think we're asking for trouble if we expect that it's "not a big 
deal" to add a feature here and there.

-Chuck



-- 
Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
   * Education			| -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
   * Integration		| http://www.quantumlinux.com
   * Support			| chuckw quantumlinux com

A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]