[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: System
- From: Chuck Wolber <chuckw quantumlinux com>
- To: Supporting EOLd RHL and Fedora releases<fedora-legacy-list lists dulug duke edu>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: System
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 22:43:42 -0800 (PST)
> My idea is that once things are handed over to the Legacy Project, they
> should be considered more or less "frozen". It's not that I want to
> lock out Legacy users from newer features, it's just that I believe
> these releases should be looked upon as "stable" and not mucked with
> unnecessarily. I doubt the Project will have a lot of extra QA
> resources, so we'd need to concentrate them where they can do the most
> good for the least effort.
I would echo that sentiment, both from a resources and stability point of
view. I think we're asking for trouble if we expect that it's "not a big
deal" to add a feature here and there.
-Chuck
--
Quantum Linux Laboratories - ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
* Education | -=^ Ad Astra Per Aspera ^=-
* Integration | http://www.quantumlinux.com
* Support | chuckw quantumlinux com
A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]