[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Possible Mirrors (was Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Delay? Looksbad for Fedora)
- From: "David A. Cafaro" <dac cafaro net>
- To: fedora-legacy-list redhat com
- Subject: Possible Mirrors (was Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Delay? Looksbad for Fedora)
- Date: 07 Nov 2003 22:38:25 -0500
Just to add to the possible mirrors, I'm trying to arrange a server to
provide a mirror for the project at my work as well. I don't know if
this is a guarantee, waiting on the higher ups to decided (policy thing,
I only control the technical stuff). Regardless I'm going to find some
way to help out (even if It mean finding my old rusty C/C++ skills).
-David
On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 20:47, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 06 November 2003 22:51, Martin Kunz wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity.. what would be the requirements, bandwidth and
> > storage wise, to act reasonably as a mirror?
> >
> > Me and some of my clients will have a much easier life and sleep a
> > lot better for every additional month that the community can keep the
> > older releases alive, so we'd like to help out if we can!
>
> Not much initially. Probably outbound speeds of a T1 or better, capable
> of handling or throttling so that the usage doesn't swamp your normal
> services. Storage in the 5gigs area (very soft number, It may take us
> QUITE a while to hit 5gigs of updates).
>
> Perhaps some people who run mirrors for Red Hat currently can speak to
> the usage they see for just updates.
--
David A. Cafaro, RHCE, CCNA
dac(at)cafaro.net
Systems Analyst, Georgetown University, DC
Co-Chair CALUG (Columbia Area Linux Users Group), MD
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]