[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Call for comments - RPM upgrade
- From: Matthias Saou <thias spam spam spam spam spam spam spam egg and spam freshrpms net>
- To: fedora-legacy-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Call for comments - RPM upgrade
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:04:28 +0100
Warren Togami wrote :
> It is my opinion that RH8 and RH9 should be upgraded to the latest
> versions for the respective distros.
I totally agree. If it were only up to me, 7.x would also get rpm 4.1.1 or
4.2.x as you then get much less hassles to have the most recent apt and yum
versions working.
All my servers running 7.0 and 7.3 are now using rpm 4.1.1 and yum 2.0.x,
but I must admit that I got a weird problem on many of them after the
upgrade which required "rm -f /usr/lib/rpm/Pubkeys" to get rpm working
again... so I really wouldn't recommend mass-deploying that update in the
current state of things (rpm bug with sigs needing to be fixed?).
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow) - Linux kernel 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl
Load : 2.05 1.40 1.18
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]