Re: fedora-legacy-list Digest, Vol 6, Issue 25

[David Botsch <dwb7 ccmr cornell edu>]

My mistake. QA the ones in 1289, then, if not already done.

On 2004.08.31 12:15 John Dalbec wrote:
> > I've also taken a look through bugzilla and see that the following 
> > need QA for RH 7.3 (ie gpg signed sha1sum'ed QA reports):
> >
> > 1726: krb5
> > 1831: XFree86
>
> Bug 1831 does not apply to RH 7.3.  Or does the fact that I posted 
> packages with a higher version number mean we have to QA those 
> instead of the packages from bug 1289?
> My application of the patch in bug 1831 shouldn't cause problems with 
> XFree86 in RH 7.3; it just adds a redundant sanity check.
> Should I build new packages without the patch?  Which bug should I 
> post them in?
> John
>
>
> --
> fedora-legacy-list mailing list
> fedora-legacy-list redhat com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

--
********************************
David William Botsch
Consultant/Advisor II
CCMR Computing Facility
dwb7 ccmr cornell edu
********************************