Red Hat released new elm package for RHAS 2.1

[Warren Togami]

Christian Pearce wrote:
> Seth brings up an interesting issue.  If we don't have people
> interested in fixing a package, then it will still be vulnerable.
> Should we keep track of this in bugzilla?  Just create a bug and tag
> it NOOWNER.  Or something like that?  This way we don't give people
> the idea that everything is fixed security wise if you use
> FedoraLegacy.
> 
> Just a thought.
> 

Please file the report with LEGACY keyword.  Perhaps "NOPACKAGE" within 
the bug title until an actual package is posted at a later date.

Warren