Self-Introduction: Jonas Pasche
Jesse Keating
jkeating at j2solutions.net
Fri Jan 16 21:22:41 UTC 2004
On Friday 16 January 2004 12:25, Jonas Pasche wrote:
> Fixed. For my clarification; what exactly is the difference between
> these two words? Red Hat publishes all updates as "errata" with the
> subcategories "security alerts", "bugfixes" and "enhancements";
> that's why I thought "errata" would be appropriate.
I differ to Warren on this one. We're using "updates" based on his
recommendation. He had good reasons, I just forgot them.
> > Number 4, the mirror list will have locations, so we can flat list
> > areas of the world and list mirrors that way.
>
> What does that mean for the published page? IMHO we should
> dynamically provide a link to a near mirror, based on the IP of the
> user, and give the option to list other mirrors. Alternatively, show
> the fedora.us download URL, but let the link target be a page to
> select a mirror instead of a direct link to the fedora.us download
> server.
>
> Any suggestions?
Way too complicated. Who cares where the browser IP is, they could be
getting links for a box that is half a country away from them ( I
constantly do ). A simple mirror list split by geographical region,
allowing the end user to pick their place would be best.
> > Number 5, the example should be on the download page probably.
> > Link to it.
>
> I'll include this in my still-to-do end user "How to use Fedora
> Legacy" page. Actually I find that title better than "Download",
> because using Fedory Legacy isn't actually like downloading and
> installing a package, but that's open to discussion.
I like that name too, works for me.
> > Number 7, We're free and public, we're providing longer support, we
> > support yum/apt freedownloads, we will support Fedora Core.
>
> Fixed. How long will Progeny provide support? I haven't found a
> concrete statement on their website, so how can we tell that we're
> providing longer support?
Don't know for sure.
> > Number 8, change the "to" to "two". To answer your question, it's
> > more of when RH no longer supports FC3, thats when Legacy picks it
> > up, and no longer supports FC1. Legacy will end up (officially)
> > supporting 2 FC releases at any given time.
>
> Fixed, but still not-so-easy to understand, I think. Maybe a small
> graph can clarify this? If yes - volunteers? I'm not good at such
> things.
Instead of a graph, how about a simple timeline that has the events
rather than dates.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy)
Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Was I helpful? Let others know:
http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legacy-list/attachments/20040116/85c30c4d/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list