Theory on update-testing.

[Jesse Keating]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 28 January 2004 07:56, Christian Pearce wrote:
> I just updated yum, I have machines I wanted to get [update-testing].
>  So I uncomment it in /etc/yum.conf.  Is it safe to leave [updates]?
>  Should it be there?

You can leave updates.  Packages are moved (literally mv 
updates-testing/i386/foo /updates/i386/) from updates-testing to updates, 
not rebuild or changed along the way.

> My general feeling is the packages should be the same once it goes from
> updates-testing to updates.  Though updates-testing might change along
> the way.  Another reason we need to bump builds.

That is my current policy.

- -- 
Jesse Keating RHCE	(http://geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team	(http://www.fedoralegacy.org)
Mondo DevTeam		(www.mondorescue.org)
GPG Public Key		(http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAF+IK4v2HLvE71NURAvpoAJ9nXImFmfo7STygoqtMirwvBxSJDQCgs3D2
FE5hd+lGXylrH3F9fJ81G8E=
=QhW2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----