Laundry list...
Eric Rostetter
rostetter at mail.utexas.edu
Wed Jan 28 17:31:23 UTC 2004
Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net>:
> This is a real problem, and one I envisioned from the start. When I
> started this project, I only wanted to support RHL 7.3 and 9, but due to
> community influence, I've included support for 7.2 and 8.0 as well. I'm
> going to implement a policy that if a package receives good feedback on
> 7.3, and no other feedback with in 3 days, that the entire package group
> will be pushed to updates. Does anybody have a problem with this policy?
I'd rather say if it receives good feedback on either 7.x version, and
good feedback on either of the 8/9 versions, then push them all. The 7.x
versions are close enough to justify pushing one based on the other, and
the 8/9 versions are somewhat close enough also. But to push 9 based on
7.3 seems a stretch unless the patch was really trivial.
Now, that doesn't matter as much until we take over support for 9 anyway.
If you are going to push all versions based on feedback of one version,
maybe we should at least put a note/disclaimer in the announcement that
it was done that way?
Having said that, feel free to ignore my opinion if desired ;) I'm not
really very attached to it ;)
--
Eric Rostetter
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list