Laundry list...
David Rees
drees at greenhydrant.com
Wed Jan 28 17:53:18 UTC 2004
Eric Rostetter wrote, On 1/28/2004 9:31 AM:
> Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating at j2solutions.net>:
>
>>This is a real problem, and one I envisioned from the start. When I
>>started this project, I only wanted to support RHL 7.3 and 9, but due to
>>community influence, I've included support for 7.2 and 8.0 as well. I'm
>>going to implement a policy that if a package receives good feedback on
>>7.3, and no other feedback with in 3 days, that the entire package group
>>will be pushed to updates. Does anybody have a problem with this policy?
>
> I'd rather say if it receives good feedback on either 7.x version, and
> good feedback on either of the 8/9 versions, then push them all. The 7.x
> versions are close enough to justify pushing one based on the other, and
> the 8/9 versions are somewhat close enough also. But to push 9 based on
> 7.3 seems a stretch unless the patch was really trivial.
This policy makes sense to me. But ultimately it should be up to the
bug-owner to make the final decision on a per-package basis.
-Dave
More information about the fedora-legacy-list
mailing list